🔗 Share this article

The Life Cycle of a Cult can be marked by distinct phases.

1. The Big Idea

A charismatic leader or figureheads present a revolutionary approach pledging a solution for struggling players.

Thus we find ourselves. They’re getting ready to challenge the establishment down in Brisbane. Tensions are rising. Smoke is rising from within. One individual, exposed, anxious, the slogan POSITIVE INTENT smeared across his chest as a symbol, has emerged into view and is removed with discretion towards an inconclusive loan stint elsewhere.

Remember the start, when the world was still young? The era of early Bazball, of pure instinct.

2. The Honeymoon Phase

Team architects offer a reboot, optimism ahead, support, success among a group who all believe in the big idea.

How did it feel initially? A team united feeling good. Ink. Muscles. Focus. Peak performance vibes. Admittedly, The squad insist it’s not a real term, amusingly as it’s denied, what did we see?

However, everyone understands the concept. It’s the batsman attempting a move so outrageous it’s beyond belief. It’s the thrill of the leader in ultimate mode, an expression conveying: focused titan, beard made of wood, natural look, so authentically Modern Savage you almost imagine to glance over and notice he’s fielding on the ground shirtless holding a fish.

It’s Ben Duckett still being allowed addressing the media, appearing as a happy little woodland creature formally attired, uttering phrases such as we are actively deconstructing the orange. And yes, the vibe, for quite a long time, was only good energy.

3. Expansion Period

Development stage. Unity enforced by rote learning of key phrases. These principles can appear contradictory as a loyalty check.

Am I alone? The reaction, the anger, the disappointment after the first Ashes Test defeat feels overblown, unwarranted. The batting collapsed in Perth, as is typical there. They were torn apart defensively during a brief period when tactics failed, manipulated by the batsman batting like England but better, adaptive to conditions, a man playing with brilliance.

And now we have this the attacks, the anger, the perception of the team as a disgrace. The consensus is that losing isn’t enough, they need to lose righteously, to be scoured, destroyed, overwhelmed through sheer skill of Mitchell Starc’s movements, the low-fi orthodoxies of Scott Boland, marking his wickets modestly similar to getting a rewarding prize. What impact will this have?

4. External Conflict

Problems arise due to setbacks. Yet, mistakes are denied. It turns to hatred of the outside world.

Ultimately, approaching the upcoming game, we’ve entered an intriguing moment in the story of this movement. England could quite easily win overseas in a blur of adrenal disruption. Probably, failure may follow. In case of defeat it appears we could be witnessing the decline.

Before that happens, a couple of points to note about this. More than two years ago, back in those heady early days, of optimism and energy, I wrote an article calling it a phenomenon. There was outrage, which proved the point because everyone knows the best way of proving lack of cult status is should followers send hundreds of furiously one-eyed messages rejecting criticism of the beliefs.

What has happened lately is just as interesting. Opposition to the style is now the trend. Social media is furious, disappointed commentators, pictures of upset followers overseas disappointed by the short match, similar to people wanting fairness.

Conversely, exists the larger scene of the host’s complex deep-seated frustration towards the unconventional visitors, out there saying, your cherished traditions and have developed to distinguish yourselves from others, well, it’s all a bit of a gag after all.

Here lies the truth. All movements are similar. The approach was a phenomenon because cricket is a cult. Or at least, the sport in England is closed, a circle, a garden party, a restricted environment with centuries of opaque and ritualistic cult history behind it. Historically, this was where influence is guarded. It’s the colonial game of England, the early image-makers. And notably, the country is a phenomenon, a series of esoteric hierarchies, a monarchy still exists.

The players have been isolated within this world for years. Seeking change, to foster positivity, they are just repeating their own experience, creating another a bubble, a closed circle, but doing it this time with a modern squad and a coach encouraging individuality as long as yourself is quite a lot like myself.

Live where your feet are. Confront risks. However much you change, you’re always basically in the same place.

Reflecting on this, it is perhaps the moment to offer compassion for the movement, to recognize its positives, of which there are many. What does it represent? Promoting liberation. Defying norms. Batting aggressively|Attacking with